About
FTC Enforcement

FTC Enforcement

Tracking FTC, DOJ, and state-AG antitrust enforcement - merger reviews, deceptive-practices actions, monopolization cases, and the regulators' shifting priorities.

7 entries in Litigator Tracker

FTC and Congress intensify surveillance pricing crackdown amid state legislative wave

Federal regulators and lawmakers are moving aggressively against surveillance pricing—the practice of using consumer data to set individualized prices for identical products or services. In April 2026, FTC leadership told Congress that staff work on the issue continues, with the agency considering whether new disclosure requirements should apply to highly personalized, data-driven pricing. That same month, the House Oversight Committee launched a formal investigation, sending letters to major travel and platform companies demanding documentation on revenue management algorithms, consumer data practices, and testing protocols.

FTC Reports $2.1B Losses from Social Media Scams in 2025

The Federal Trade Commission released data on April 27, 2026, documenting $2.1 billion in reported losses from social media scams during 2025—making them the costliest fraud contact method on record. Nearly 30 percent of victims who lost money reported the fraud originated on social media, an eightfold increase from 2020. Facebook accounted for the largest share of losses, exceeding WhatsApp and Instagram combined and surpassing text or email scams individually.

Surge in "Junk Fee" Class Actions Targets Hidden Pricing Practices

The Federal Trade Commission's Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees took effect on May 12, 2025, requiring companies to disclose total prices upfront for live-event tickets and short-term lodging, including all mandatory fees. The rule has accelerated an already-steep rise in junk fee litigation across ticketing, hospitality, banking, and rental industries. Class actions and mass arbitrations alleging "drip pricing"—the practice of hiding or misrepresenting fees until late in transactions—have spiked since 2022, with potential exposures exceeding $10 million per case. California's SB 478, effective July 1, 2024, compounds liability by imposing penalties up to $2,500 per violation. Plaintiffs' firms are pursuing coordinated mass arbitrations against ticket sellers, banks, landlords, and online retailers, often bypassing class-action waivers through arbitration clauses.

Trump Admin Releases National AI Framework on March 20, 2026

On March 20, 2026, the Trump administration released the "National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence: Legislative Recommendations," a detailed statutory blueprint that would establish uniform federal AI policy and preempt most state regulations. The Framework, mandated by an December 2025 executive order, proposes that Congress delegate AI development oversight to existing sector-specific agencies rather than create a new federal regulator. It would allow states limited authority only in narrow areas: child safety, fraud prevention, zoning, and government procurement. The administration has tasked the Department of Justice with challenging state AI laws through a dedicated task force, while the Department of Commerce will evaluate state regulations deemed "onerous," and the Federal Trade Commission will enforce preemption policies on deceptive practices.

If you see this iCloud message on your iPhone, don’t click it—it’s a scam

A widespread phishing campaign is targeting Apple users globally with fraudulent emails and text messages impersonating iCloud notifications. The scams warn recipients that their cloud storage is full and direct them to click links to upgrade or manage their accounts. Those links lead to convincing fake websites designed to harvest Apple ID credentials, credit card information, and other sensitive data—sometimes triggering malware downloads. Apple has confirmed it sends legitimate storage alerts only through device settings and official system notifications, never through unsolicited emails or texts requesting passwords or payment information.

CT AG Tong Issues Feb. 25 Memo Applying Existing Laws to AI

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong issued a memorandum on February 25, 2026, clarifying how existing state law applies to artificial intelligence systems. The advisory targets four enforcement areas: civil rights laws prohibiting AI-driven discrimination in hiring, housing, lending, insurance, and healthcare; the Connecticut Data Privacy Act, which requires companies to disclose AI use, obtain consent for sensitive data collection, minimize data retention, conduct protection assessments for high-risk AI processing, and honor consumer deletion rights even within trained models; data safeguards and breach notification requirements; and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act and antitrust laws, which address deceptive AI claims, fake reviews, robocalls, and algorithmic price-fixing. The memorandum applies broadly to any business deploying AI in consequential decisions and specifically references harms including AI-generated nonconsensual imagery on platforms like xAI's Grok.

LawSnap Briefing Updated May 6, 2026

State of play.

  • State AG coalitions are now winning major antitrust cases independently of federal agencies. A bipartisan 33-state coalition secured a jury verdict against Live Nation and Ticketmaster on all Sherman Act counts after DOJ settled mid-trial, and eight states blocked the Nexstar-Tegna merger post-close — establishing that federal clearance no longer ends the antitrust risk calculus .
  • Surveillance pricing and algorithmic pricing tools have become the FTC's highest-velocity regulatory front. FTC leadership has told Congress that staff work continues on disclosure requirements for individualized data-driven pricing; the House Oversight Committee has launched a formal investigation; and more than 40 bills across 24 states have been introduced targeting the practice (→ FTC and Congress intensify surveillance pricing crackdown amid state legislative wave).
  • The FTC is deploying enforcement across an unusually wide front simultaneously — "Made in USA" sweeps, food-delivery fee rulemaking, MLM earnings claims, timeshare exit fraud, subscription dark patterns, and healthcare competition — all under a two-commissioner quorum (→ Federal and State Regulators Target Grocery Chains, Landlords, MLMs, and Credit Agencies).
  • The DOJ's criminal antitrust probe into beef packers and imminent civil suit against egg producers signal that agricultural commodity pricing is now a priority enforcement vector, with the egg theory — coordination through an industry benchmarking service — potentially the most consequential new liability theory in the corpus .
  • For counsel advising companies in concentrated industries, consumer-facing platforms, or any business using algorithmic or data-driven pricing, the practical baseline is that federal clearance, settlement, or regulatory approval no longer terminates exposure — state coalitions, private plaintiffs, and a newly energized FTC are all operating independently and simultaneously.

Where things stand.

  • Live Nation/Ticketmaster verdict opens structural remedies phase. The 33-state coalition secured a jury finding of unlawful monopolization across primary ticketing, amphitheaters, and concert promotion; the DOJ had already settled mid-trial for $280M plus fee caps and divestiture of 13 amphitheater contracts. Judge Subramanian is overseeing remedies, which could include forced divestiture of Ticketmaster .
  • State AGs are blocking transactions that federal regulators cleared. The Nexstar-Tegna injunction — halting a closed $6.2B deal on Clayton Act §7 grounds — is the clearest statement that multistate coalitions will act independently when DOJ and FCC step aside .
  • Algorithmic pricing is under simultaneous federal and state scrutiny. The DOJ's RealPage settlement — the first of its type — prohibits use of competitors' nonpublic data for price recommendations and imposes a court monitor; California's AB 325 already bans competitor-data algorithms; and the surveillance pricing investigation is expanding into retail, grocery, hotel, and hospitality (→ FTC and Congress intensify surveillance pricing crackdown amid state legislative wave).
  • FTC under Chair Ferguson is operating with two commissioners and a defined priority stack. The FY2026-2030 Strategic Plan identifies unlawful privacy/data security, children's online safety, and Big Tech accountability as the three core vectors; the Senate Commerce oversight hearing confirmed junk fees, dark patterns, subscription traps, and TAKE IT DOWN Act enforcement as near-term operational priorities .
  • ROSCA/subscription enrollment standard is hardening. Judge Tigar (N.D. Cal.) denied Uber's motion to dismiss, holding that pre-stored payment credentials cannot substitute for fresh affirmative consent after disclosure at the point of subscription enrollment — a standard that extends to any business using stored payment for auto-enrollment .
  • Junk fee class actions and the FTC's fee-disclosure rule are compounding liability. The FTC's Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees (effective May 12, 2025) for tickets and lodging has accelerated mass arbitrations; the agency has now issued an ANPRM targeting food and grocery delivery platforms; and California's SB 478 adds $2,500-per-violation exposure (→ Surge in "Junk Fee" Class Actions Targets Hidden Pricing Practices).
  • HSR filing regime has reverted to pre-2025 requirements. The Fifth Circuit vacated the FTC's 2024 HSR overhaul; parties now file under the lighter prior form; Q1 2026 filings are up 14% year-over-year; and the size-of-transaction threshold is $133.9M .
  • FTC ad-boycott investigation is in settlement talks. Publicis, WPP, Dentsu, Havas, and Horizon Media are negotiating with the FTC over alleged coordinated ad-spend boycotts of X and other platforms; ad-verification firms and nonprofits including Global Disinformation Index and Media Matters are also implicated .
  • Big Tech monopoly litigation continues on multiple fronts. DOJ's Google search and Android cases are in active phases; Aptoide has filed an Android app-store antitrust suit in N.D. Cal.; and the FTC's Zillow/Redfin case over the Insider List Service exit remains pending .
  • State AGs are coordinating enforcement across consumer protection and antitrust simultaneously. The most recent State AG Report documents actions against Albertsons/Safeway (deceptive BOGO pricing), Mid-America Apartment Communities (junk fees), CVS Health ($45M PBM settlement), MV Realty (predatory homeowner agreements), and a 23-AG challenge to ESG policies at Fitch, Moody's, and S&P Global (→ Federal and State Regulators Target Grocery Chains, Landlords, MLMs, and Credit Agencies).

Latest developments.

Active questions and open splits.

  • Structural remedies for Live Nation. The remedies phase before Judge Subramanian is the live question — whether the state coalition pursues divestiture of Ticketmaster, forced venue divestitures, or relies on the DOJ's existing settlement terms. The answer will define the vertical-integration risk template for other concentrated industries .
  • Trade-association price-benchmarking as a coordination mechanism. The DOJ egg theory — that using a shared industry benchmarking service to set prices constitutes Sherman Act coordination — is untested at trial. If sustained, it creates exposure for any industry where competitors share pricing data through a common intermediary, including hospitality, healthcare, and agriculture .
  • Surveillance pricing: where is the line between lawful dynamic pricing and unlawful personalized pricing? The FTC's ongoing Section 6(b) study and the House investigation have not yet produced a clear standard; California's AB 2564 would draw the line at individual consumer data, but federal preemption of state rules is unresolved (→ FTC and Congress intensify surveillance pricing crackdown amid state legislative wave).
  • Post-close merger unwinding as a state-AG remedy. The Nexstar-Tegna injunction halted a closed transaction — a posture that, if replicated, means deal certainty cannot be achieved through federal clearance alone. Whether other circuits and district courts will follow the Eastern District of California's approach is open .
  • ROSCA stored-credential standard across circuits. Judge Tigar's Uber ruling establishes a working standard in N.D. Cal. — fresh affirmative consent required after disclosure, separate from the stored-credential authorization. Whether the Ninth Circuit affirms, and whether other circuits adopt the same analysis, determines the national compliance baseline for subscription businesses .
  • ABA accreditation fragmentation and legal market competition. FTC/DOJ pressure on Tennessee follows Texas and Florida — if a third state acts, the uniform national credentialing framework fractures. The downstream effects on bar admission reciprocity, law school economics, and competitive entry into legal services are uncharted .
  • FTC ad-boycott settlement terms and First Amendment limits on antitrust enforcement. Several recipients of FTC civil investigative demands have challenged the agency on First Amendment grounds and secured court injunctions. Whether the settlements that emerge include conduct restrictions on advertiser coordination — and whether those restrictions survive constitutional challenge — is unresolved .

What to watch.

  • DOJ egg-producer complaint when filed: the specific coordination theory and whether the benchmarking service is named as a co-defendant will determine how broadly the theory travels to other industries.
  • Live Nation remedies phase: whether the state coalition moves for structural relief (divestiture) or accepts behavioral remedies, and Judge Subramanian's response.
  • Surveillance pricing: whether the FTC moves from Section 6(b) study to formal rulemaking, and whether California AB 2564 or the One Fair Price Act advances — either would force a preemption confrontation.
  • DOJ criminal beef-packer investigation: whether charges are filed against Tyson, Cargill, JBS, or National Beef, and whether the criminal theory tracks the civil egg-producer theory.
  • Tennessee Supreme Court response to the FTC/DOJ ABA accreditation letter — a third state acting would trigger immediate bar-admission and law school compliance questions.
  • FTC negative option rulemaking: post-comment-period next steps following the Eighth Circuit's vacatur of the 2024 Click-to-Cancel rule, and whether the new ANPRM produces a procedurally durable rule.

mail Subscribe to FTC Enforcement email updates

Primary sources. No fluff. Straight to your inbox.

Also on LawSnap